What most likely happened to the Twin Towers.
There is no hesitation in the fact that two Boeing 757's crashed into both the North and South Towers of the World Trade Centre; but this was not the only objective that caused the towers to collapse in a demolition type manner.
The North Tower was hit by flight 11 between floors 94 and 98, and the South Tower was hit by flight 175 between floors 78 and 84. These two towers were only hit between those floors, and yet for some reason both towers collapsed like a controlled demolition. To support this statement even more, the World Trade Centre Tower 7 collapsed in the same way , but was not hit by a plane; how do you explain that?
This comes to the conclusion that the most likely story for the Twin Towers is that there were bombs placed in the buildings, preceding the plane attacks. This most likely occurred between the dates of the 23rd of August until the 3rd or 4th of September, 2001. Between these dates there had been video footage recorded of trucks going to and from the WTC buildings in the middle of the night. Throughout this course it gave whoever was involved with the scheme, a perfect opportunity to inspect the area and decided where suitable places would be to plant bombs/explosives.
Not only were the trucks key evidence of "controlled demolitions", but witnesses of the event were evidence too. There were many members of the public, victims of the attacks, and fire fighters who felt explosions occur. Many even heard the sounds of bombs going off, as well as feeling bombs go off in the building too.
It is quite clear to see that this theory of "controlled demolitions", is highly possible. There was the ideal opportunity to place/install bombs in the towers; and this was evident in the video footage recorded. Also with the witnesses believing they felt and heard bombs exploding, gives even more support towards the theory. Lastly the major give away was the way in which the towers collapsed. With both of the towers being hit in the upper levels, it would make sense for those upper levels to collapse due to not having the required support. The fact that the whole building collapsed in a demolition type manner, raised the question of controlled demolitions.
From this it is comprehensible that bombs/explosives were placed in the twin towers prior the plane attacks; and the crashes of the planes were just a distraction from the bombs. This theory tolerates the way in which the towers collapsed - the pattern of controlled demolitions.
The North Tower was hit by flight 11 between floors 94 and 98, and the South Tower was hit by flight 175 between floors 78 and 84. These two towers were only hit between those floors, and yet for some reason both towers collapsed like a controlled demolition. To support this statement even more, the World Trade Centre Tower 7 collapsed in the same way , but was not hit by a plane; how do you explain that?
This comes to the conclusion that the most likely story for the Twin Towers is that there were bombs placed in the buildings, preceding the plane attacks. This most likely occurred between the dates of the 23rd of August until the 3rd or 4th of September, 2001. Between these dates there had been video footage recorded of trucks going to and from the WTC buildings in the middle of the night. Throughout this course it gave whoever was involved with the scheme, a perfect opportunity to inspect the area and decided where suitable places would be to plant bombs/explosives.
Not only were the trucks key evidence of "controlled demolitions", but witnesses of the event were evidence too. There were many members of the public, victims of the attacks, and fire fighters who felt explosions occur. Many even heard the sounds of bombs going off, as well as feeling bombs go off in the building too.
It is quite clear to see that this theory of "controlled demolitions", is highly possible. There was the ideal opportunity to place/install bombs in the towers; and this was evident in the video footage recorded. Also with the witnesses believing they felt and heard bombs exploding, gives even more support towards the theory. Lastly the major give away was the way in which the towers collapsed. With both of the towers being hit in the upper levels, it would make sense for those upper levels to collapse due to not having the required support. The fact that the whole building collapsed in a demolition type manner, raised the question of controlled demolitions.
From this it is comprehensible that bombs/explosives were placed in the twin towers prior the plane attacks; and the crashes of the planes were just a distraction from the bombs. This theory tolerates the way in which the towers collapsed - the pattern of controlled demolitions.