Conspiracy Theory 3 - What actually hit the Pentagon?
The attack significantly doesn't hold up.
Everyone has been told to believe from the commission report, that American Airline Flight 77 - Boeing 757 - crashed into the side of the Pentagon (United States of America, Military Base), on the 11th of September, 2001. From many discoveries and research taken place, there is proof that the Boeing 757 did not crash into the Pentagon; as there is no possible way of it fitting through the hole that was produced.
The Boeing 757 is 155ft, 3 inches long (from nose to tail). It has a wingspan (wing tip to wing tip), of 124ft, 10 inches. And is 44ft, six inches high (at the tail point). And yet somehow it is believed that the Boeing 757, crashed and created a hole of 73ft in height, and 65ft in width in the Pentagon. This is not possible and the Boeing 757 could not have created a hole that small in the Pentagon.
Firstly, the crash supposedly caused by the Boeing 757, is very conflicting with other crashes into the World Trade Centre Buildings. This is strongly supported by the fact that there is over 86,000 gallons of fuel left over in all of the hijacked planes that were involved in the 911 attacks; and yet the Pentagon did not go up in flames in the same way the World Trade Centre Towers did - there was very little fire damage to the Pentagon. There are visible photos showing intact office furniture - computers, wooden desks, and even a wooden stall with an open book, all on the edge of the open hole. However none of these objects had visible signs of fire damage. So how can there be such little fire damage, when there was such a high amount of fuel being released from the airline?
Secondly, there was no evidence or pieces of wreckage directly linked to Flight 77's crash. There were no pieces of engine, nor bodies, or even seats of the plane recovered from the damage. Not even luggage from the 62 passengers on board the plane. So how can it be that the Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon, if there isn't a single piece of evidence in sight?
Lastly, the Pentagon is one of the most secured buildings in the world; having 24 hour surveillance. But only five blurred frames of video were exposed to the public - all of which did nothing to clear up the confusion. Also the FBI (Federal Bureau Investigation),have 85 video tapes in their possession that have not been released to the public; so what have they got to hide? The most suspicious thing yet, is the confiscation of video footage from a gas station across the road from the Pentagon. Within minutes of the Pentagon incident, FBI arrived at the gas station to confiscate the footage from the station's surveillance cameras.
So the heat was severe enough to vanish the plane, but yet not severe enough to set office furniture or books on fire? And there are so many videos of footage out there, and yet none of them have been released to the public? Why are the United States of America keeping so much a secret?
The question is, what caused all of the damage; if it wasn't the Boeing 757? It is believed to be a small commuter plane or some type of missile, because the Boeing 757 just doesn't meet the criteria of the damage made.
The Boeing 757 is 155ft, 3 inches long (from nose to tail). It has a wingspan (wing tip to wing tip), of 124ft, 10 inches. And is 44ft, six inches high (at the tail point). And yet somehow it is believed that the Boeing 757, crashed and created a hole of 73ft in height, and 65ft in width in the Pentagon. This is not possible and the Boeing 757 could not have created a hole that small in the Pentagon.
Firstly, the crash supposedly caused by the Boeing 757, is very conflicting with other crashes into the World Trade Centre Buildings. This is strongly supported by the fact that there is over 86,000 gallons of fuel left over in all of the hijacked planes that were involved in the 911 attacks; and yet the Pentagon did not go up in flames in the same way the World Trade Centre Towers did - there was very little fire damage to the Pentagon. There are visible photos showing intact office furniture - computers, wooden desks, and even a wooden stall with an open book, all on the edge of the open hole. However none of these objects had visible signs of fire damage. So how can there be such little fire damage, when there was such a high amount of fuel being released from the airline?
Secondly, there was no evidence or pieces of wreckage directly linked to Flight 77's crash. There were no pieces of engine, nor bodies, or even seats of the plane recovered from the damage. Not even luggage from the 62 passengers on board the plane. So how can it be that the Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon, if there isn't a single piece of evidence in sight?
Lastly, the Pentagon is one of the most secured buildings in the world; having 24 hour surveillance. But only five blurred frames of video were exposed to the public - all of which did nothing to clear up the confusion. Also the FBI (Federal Bureau Investigation),have 85 video tapes in their possession that have not been released to the public; so what have they got to hide? The most suspicious thing yet, is the confiscation of video footage from a gas station across the road from the Pentagon. Within minutes of the Pentagon incident, FBI arrived at the gas station to confiscate the footage from the station's surveillance cameras.
So the heat was severe enough to vanish the plane, but yet not severe enough to set office furniture or books on fire? And there are so many videos of footage out there, and yet none of them have been released to the public? Why are the United States of America keeping so much a secret?
The question is, what caused all of the damage; if it wasn't the Boeing 757? It is believed to be a small commuter plane or some type of missile, because the Boeing 757 just doesn't meet the criteria of the damage made.
Above: Video supporting the Pentagon Conspiracy Theory.