What most likely happened to the Pentagon.
The most likely theory of what hit the Pentagon is without doubt that it was not a Boeing 757 - flight 77, but instead some type of commuter plane or missile. All statements made about the Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon are false accusations and not true. It is not possible for the plane to have crashed into the Pentagon due to the size of the hole, no video footage, and the amount of damage it should have made.
The Pentagon is the main Military base for the United States of America, and is one of the most secure buildings in the world. The Pentagon has 24 hour surveillance, with at least four or five security cameras aimed in the direction of the crash. There are 85 video tapes in the FBI's custody; none of which have been released to the public to view. Also the gas station across the road from the Pentagon, had video footage on their surveillance cameras of the crash. However within minutes after the incident, the FBI confiscated the evidence.
The main obvious evidence of the theory is the size of the hole made in the building, compared to the size of the plane. A Boeing 757 is 124ft in width, and the hole produced in the Pentagon is only 65ft in width. This proves that it is not possible for a plane that big, to create a hole that small.
Also the Boeing 757 was carrying at least 86,000 gallons of fuel on board and this should have created a massive fire that would be uncontrollable for days. It also would have destroyed a larger section of the building and majority of the surrounding area would have been burnt. This did not happen. Even on the edge of the open hole, there was office furniture intact and a lot of items that had not been burnt. This does not make sense and adds to the theory's idea.
Lastly, there was no evidence at the site linking to Flight 77's 'crash'. There were no bodies, or luggage or even the engine visible at the alleged crash site. It is clear to see from all of this evidence that Flight 77 - a Boeing 757, did not crash into the Pentagon. It either had to be some type of missile or commuter plane. The World and especially America have been lied to about this supposed 'crash' into the Pentagon; so what is it that the United States of America have to hide?
The Pentagon is the main Military base for the United States of America, and is one of the most secure buildings in the world. The Pentagon has 24 hour surveillance, with at least four or five security cameras aimed in the direction of the crash. There are 85 video tapes in the FBI's custody; none of which have been released to the public to view. Also the gas station across the road from the Pentagon, had video footage on their surveillance cameras of the crash. However within minutes after the incident, the FBI confiscated the evidence.
The main obvious evidence of the theory is the size of the hole made in the building, compared to the size of the plane. A Boeing 757 is 124ft in width, and the hole produced in the Pentagon is only 65ft in width. This proves that it is not possible for a plane that big, to create a hole that small.
Also the Boeing 757 was carrying at least 86,000 gallons of fuel on board and this should have created a massive fire that would be uncontrollable for days. It also would have destroyed a larger section of the building and majority of the surrounding area would have been burnt. This did not happen. Even on the edge of the open hole, there was office furniture intact and a lot of items that had not been burnt. This does not make sense and adds to the theory's idea.
Lastly, there was no evidence at the site linking to Flight 77's 'crash'. There were no bodies, or luggage or even the engine visible at the alleged crash site. It is clear to see from all of this evidence that Flight 77 - a Boeing 757, did not crash into the Pentagon. It either had to be some type of missile or commuter plane. The World and especially America have been lied to about this supposed 'crash' into the Pentagon; so what is it that the United States of America have to hide?